|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Wednesday, 18 June 2008 |
|
Well, he has endorsed S. 796, the best currency misalignment bill out there. But what to make of this?
In an interview with Fortune to be featured in the magazine's
upcoming issue, the presumptive Democratic nominee suggests he doesn't
want to unilaterally blow up NAFTA after all.
"Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and
amplified," he conceded, after I reminded him that he had called NAFTA
"devastating" and "a big mistake," despite nonpartisan studies
concluding that the trade zone has had a mild, positive effect on the
U.S. economy.
Does that mean his rhetoric was overheated and amplified? "Politicians
are always guilty of that, and I don't exempt myself," he answered.
What Obama says now is that he believes in "opening up a dialogue" with
trading partners Canada and Mexico "and figuring to how we can make
this work for all people." ...
In the Fortune interview, Obama noted that despite his support for
opening markets, "there are costs to free trade" that must be
recognized. He noted that under NAFTA, a more efficient U.S.
agricultural industry displaced Mexican farmers, adding to the problem
of illegal immigration.
We "can't pretend that those costs aren't real," Obama added.
Otherwise, he added, it feeds "the protectionist sentiment and the
anti-immigration sentiment that is out there in both parties."
Obama
also reiterated his determination to be a tougher trade bargainer. "The
Chinese love free trade," he said, "but they are tough as nails when it
comes to a bargain, right? They will resist any calls to stop
manipulating their currency. It's no secret they have consistently
encroached on our intellectual property and our copyright laws. ...We
should make sure in our trade negotiations that our interests and our
values are adequately reflected."
And then there's McCain.
Republican nominee John McCain, for his part, is emphasizing his consistent position as a free-trader.
Trackback(0)
|
|