|
Free traders' public support is gone |
|
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Wednesday, 18 June 2008 |
|
"Free traders" don't have public support anymore.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey taken Monday
night finds that 56% of voters support renegotiation while 39% say U.S.
free trade agreements in general have directly impacted their families.
Of that latter group, 73% say the impact has been a bad one, as opposed
to 14% who say it was beneficial.
Only
16% of respondents favor NAFTA a pact which came into being in 1994
and lowers nearly all trade barriers between the U.S., Canada and
Mexico -- as is, with 28% undecided.
Policy wonks want more detail, but NAFTA is the surrogate language
for free trade policy that Congress continues to pursue. To the guys
at the bowling alley, NAFTA is free trade. NAFTA is the Peru,
Columbia, South Korea and Panama FTA's.
Politicians will support
the failed version of free trade policy
unless the voters say otherwise. That is why grassroots work is so
important. We all need to tell McCain and Obama, our Senate
candidates, our Congressional candidates, and our state legislative
candidates that we need a new free trade policy. They are crassly
strategic in angling for our votes. We must be crassly strategic in
persuading or rejecting them. That's the deal in a democracy.
The Coalition for a Prosperous America has 10 principles
to guide them. But all you need to say is don't sign new trade
agreements until you figure it out. Trade deficits, outsourcing,
currency manipulation, dangerous food, unsafe products, selling U.S.
assets to pay for our deficit. Take your pick of problems to
confront them with.
Trackback(0)
|
|
In the news
|
The following article appeared on the online site for Manufacturing & Technology News on November 17, 2008 and was written by Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration.
By most accounts the U.S. economy is in serious trouble. Robert Reich, an adviser to President-elect Obama, calls it a "mini-depression," but that designation might be optimistic. Russian economist Mikhail Khazin says that the "U.S. will soon face a second Great Depression." It is possible that even Khazin is optimistic.
I cannot predict the future. However, I can explain what the problems are, how they differ from past times of troubles and why traditional remedies, such as the public works programs that Reich proposes, are unlikely to succeed in reviving the U.S. economy. |
|
Read more...
|
|