Free traders' public support is gone PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Wednesday, 18 June 2008

"Free traders" don't have public support anymore

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey taken Monday night finds that 56% of voters support renegotiation while 39% say U.S. free trade agreements in general have directly impacted their families. Of that latter group, 73% say the impact has been a bad one, as opposed to 14% who say it was beneficial. 

Only 16% of respondents favor NAFTA – a pact which came into being in 1994 and lowers nearly all trade barriers between the U.S., Canada and Mexico -- as is, with 28% undecided.

Policy wonks want more detail, but NAFTA is the surrogate language for free trade policy that Congress continues to pursue.  To the guys at the bowling alley, NAFTA is free trade.  NAFTA is the Peru, Columbia, South Korea and Panama FTA's. 

Politicians will support the failed version of free trade policy unless the voters say otherwise.  That is why grassroots work is so important.  We all need to tell McCain and Obama, our Senate candidates, our Congressional candidates, and our state legislative candidates that we need a new free trade policy.  They are crassly strategic in angling for our votes.  We must be crassly strategic in persuading or rejecting them.  That's the deal in a democracy.

The Coalition for a Prosperous America has 10 principles to guide them.  But all you need to say is don't sign new trade agreements until you figure it out.  Trade deficits, outsourcing, currency manipulation, dangerous food, unsafe products, selling U.S. assets to pay for our deficit.  Take your pick of problems to confront them with.

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Related Articles

In the news

The following article appeared on the online site for Manufacturing & Technology News on November 17, 2008 and was written by Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. 

By most accounts the U.S. economy is in serious trouble. Robert Reich, an adviser to President-elect Obama, calls it a "mini-depression," but that designation might be optimistic. Russian economist Mikhail Khazin says that the "U.S. will soon face a second Great Depression." It is possible that even Khazin is optimistic.

I cannot predict the future. However, I can explain what the problems are, how they differ from past times of troubles and why traditional remedies, such as the public works programs that Reich proposes, are unlikely to succeed in reviving the U.S. economy.

Read more...