|
Trade Negotator says "Sorry, I messed up" |
|
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Tuesday, 10 June 2008 |
|
From the horses mouth, via a new blog on economics and trade, on June 4, 2008.
Writing today in Foreign Policy in Focus, Robert Cassidy,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Asia and for China for the
Clinton administration, takes himself to task for the trade agreement
with China that he negotiated. Here is how he begins:
As the principal negotiator for the landmark market
access agreement that led to Chinas accession to the World Trade
Organization (WTO), I have reflected on whether the agreements we
negotiated really lived up to our expectations. A sober reflection has
led me to conclude that those trade agreements did not.
We failed to address the underlying fundamental market distortions that
skew the benefits toward the few while leaving the rest of the economy
less well off. As George Soros, in a Bloomberg News interview on the
financial crisis, recently said,
the system, as it currently
operates, is built on false premises. The premise on which our trade
agreements are negotiated is at best flawed, if not broken.
And here is a key paragraph in which he explains why the trade agreement with China failed:
Using China as an example once again, proponents of the
free trade model argue that China has a competitive advantage in wage
rates that makes it ideal as the global manufacturing center that it
has become. A closer examination, however, reveals that China has
adopted an export-led development strategy, the centerpiece of which is
a currency that is undervalued by 20-80%, with the consensus leaning
toward 40%. Thus Chinas wages, in U.S. dollar terms, are 40% cheaper
than they would have been if the currency were allowed to freely float.
Similarly, foreign investors receive a 40% subsidy to develop
operations in China. To add insult to injury, our exports are taxed at
an additional effective 40% rate....
Here is the original piece by Cassidy.
Trackback(0)
|
|
In the news
American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition
PRESS STATEMENT
United States Loses 524,000 Jobs in December
U.S. Manufacturing Employment Falls Under 13 Million
for First Time Since January 1942 United States Must Spend Stimulus Money on U.S.-Produced Goods to Boost Jobs
CONTACT: Lloyd Wood, Dir. of Membership and Media Outreach
(202) 452-0866 or
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
January 9, 2008
WASHINGTON, DC The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported
today that the United States lost 524,000 jobs in December. From
December 2007 to December 2008, U.S. nonfarm employment has fallen from
138,078,000 to 135,489,000, a loss of 2.589 million jobs.
U.S. manufacturing employment fell by 149,000 jobs in December. In the
last eight years, from December 2000 to December 2008, U.S.
manufacturing employment has fallen from 17.178 million to 12.981
million, a loss of 4.197 million good middle-class jobs. U.S.
manufacturing employment now is at its lowest level since January 1942
67 years ago.
|
|
Read more...
|
|