|
Robert Samuelson is a Washington Post op-ed guy. His free
trade world-view is crumbling around him. He used to be in the
comfortable majority, but now is in an embattled minority still defending the NAFTA-like deals that started the huge increase in imports that overwhelmed exports.
I would bet a donut that he has never read a trade agreement, to see what they really say.
Samuelson
continues the intentionally vague and misleading rhetoric that more
"trade" is good. It's like a failing airline saying it increased
"commerce," including soaring expenses within the definition of
"commerce." Shareholders would appropriately punish the CEO and the
stock.
But Samuelson does not recognize net trade. Only
trade. It is all the same. As reflected by his core,
ludicrous point:
Only through expanded trade can the economy thrive and manufacturing stage a comeback.
This stupid statement used to be rhetorically smart. Do you want to contract trade, you silly goose? Samuleson's
false truism puts trade change proponents in the position of arguing
against "expanded trade", when they are really looking to correct the
trade deficit and outsourcing problems.
The net trade result has been record deficits. Kinda like
corporate losses. They are devastating. The economic
foundation crumbles. Wall Street's imaginative bundling of debt
to trade those and create wealth that was debt can no longer obscure
the point.
|