|
John Sweeney on Colombia FTA |
|
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Monday, 14 April 2008 |
|
John Sweeney has a blistering op-ed
in the Washington Post on the Colombia FTA, focusing on President
Uribe's government complicity in the killing of labor organizers.
The power of an individual story.
Last Sept. 27, 16-year-old Andres Damian Florez Rodriguez was on
his way home from school when he was forced into a van by three armed
men. Andres is the son of Jose Domingo Florez, a leader of the
Coca-Cola bottling union in Santander. The assailants drove along,
beating the boy while they received radio instructions. Then they gave
him a message to convey: "Tell your papa that we won't rest until we
see [the union leaders] quartered in pieces."
On March 22, Adolfo Gonzalez Montes, a member of the Barrancas local
Union of Coal Miners, was found dead in his home, tortured and shot,
after his union received death threats during a union conflict.
On March 9, Carlos Burbano, vice president of the National Hospital
Workers' Union in Colombia, was murdered in San Vicente del Caguán
after leading a local peace march. His corpse was found in the city
dump, his face disfigured with acid. He was one of four Colombian trade
unionists killed in a single week. Their deaths were not random crimes
in a dangerous country. Rather, the Colombian government has falsely
denounced union activists as guerrilla sympathizers, opening the door
for paramilitary groups' death threats.
False promises are highlighted.
Globalization and trade should lift up and promote democratic
societies. They should empower the many and lift the poor. They should
create a fundamentally better world.
Wacko editorial page complicity is noted.
The editorial pages of virtually every major American newspaper
have weighed in with unusual intensity. They have heaped praise on the
Uribe administration's self-described successes and vigorously
excoriated "bogus" claims about violence against unionists.
There are really no good arguments for the Colombia FTA. Their
economy is too small to matter mathematically for us. If the goal
is foreign policy, then foreign policy tools should be used instead of
economy-gutting trade policy tools. And, oh yes, the NAFTA model
is a failure. A new trade policy is needed before signing more
deals.
Trackback(0)
|
|