|
More on Hillary's early NAFTA support |
|
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Thursday, 20 March 2008 |
|
The 11-10-93 meeting Hillary Clinton held to push NAFTA. 120
people expected. Hillary has said she did not agree with
NAFTA. David Gergen, who I do not trust, said she was
"unenthusiastic about NAFTA."
But two attendees of the meeting have now spoken. Unnamed attendees cited by ABC news... and I kind of hate when the press quotes unnamed sources.
Two attendees of that closed-door briefing, neither of whom are
affiliated with any campaign, describe that event for ABC News. It was
a room full of women involved in international trade. David Gergen
served as a sort of master of ceremonies as various women members of
the Cabinet talked up NAFTA, which had yet to pass Congress.
"It wasnt a drop-by it was organized around her participation," said
one attendee. "Her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA and what a good thing
it would be for the economy. There was no equivocation for her support
for NAFTA at the time. Folks were pleased that she came by. If this is
a still a question about what Hillary's position when she was First
Lady, she was totally supportive of NAFTA.
That first attendee recalls that the First Lady's office in the East
Wing put together "the invitation list, who was invited authorizations
and all that stuff."
And what is this attendee's response to Clinton today distancing
herself from NAFTA? "For people who worked hard to pass NAFTA and who
support the importance of markets opening for the economy in the long
term, they're very upset. A number of the women who were there are very
upset. You need to have some integrity in your position. The Clintons
when Bill Clinton was president took a moderate position on trade for
Democrats. For her to repudiate that now seems pretty phony."
Recalls a second attendee, "they were looking for women in
international trade who supported NAFTA. Senator Clinton came by at the
end. And of course she asked for our support and help in passing NAFTA."
Women who attended that event, the second attendee says, have been
incredulous to see Clinton distance herself from the trade agreement as
she campaigns today. "They're all saying, 'What's this all about?' We
all heard it firsthand." She says Clinton isn't being honest with
voters today.
I disbelieve any claim Hillary did not support NAFTA. I would
believe it if she said she now sees the NAFTA model as a mistake.
Oh... by the way. McCain is a wacko free trader.
This issue is tying them in knots. What's the matter with
ditching the patchwork quilt of NAFTA agreements and just applying our
own trade laws? We are the biggest economy in the world, and
those wanting to sell here can just play by our rules. Those
rules... the U.S. trade laws... are really pretty good and fair.
Trackback(0)
|
|
In the news
|
The following article appeared on the online site for Manufacturing & Technology News on November 17, 2008 and was written by Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration.
By most accounts the U.S. economy is in serious trouble. Robert Reich, an adviser to President-elect Obama, calls it a "mini-depression," but that designation might be optimistic. Russian economist Mikhail Khazin says that the "U.S. will soon face a second Great Depression." It is possible that even Khazin is optimistic.
I cannot predict the future. However, I can explain what the problems are, how they differ from past times of troubles and why traditional remedies, such as the public works programs that Reich proposes, are unlikely to succeed in reviving the U.S. economy. |
|
Read more...
|
|