On the new trade agreements PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Friday, 15 February 2008

We must approve every document negotiated by the US Trade Representative knuckleheads without amendment, and regardless of stupid and destructive provisions, so long as the document says "trade agreement" on the first page.  Otherwise we are anti-trade... protectionists...  curling up in the fetal position of self-doubt and worry.

So say the wacko free traders.

"It's very alarming," Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez said. "This is the very time for us not to have second thoughts or convey a lack of confidence in free trade to the world. 

The remaining three trade agreements negotiated under Fast Track rules (Fast Track expired last June) are facing real resistance.  Thankfully. 

Sens. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) presented legislation last week that would make it more difficult to pass trade agreements unless they are accompanied by a more thorough financial analysis. It would mandate inclusion of what they call essential data, such as estimates of how many U.S. jobs would be lost or gained. "The facts are [Colombia] is another trade agreement modeled on NAFTA," Brown said. "We will stop it."

Thank you Senators Dorgan and Brown.

Free trade "isn't our pi¿ata, it's not that somebody has a blindfold on and is striking at it," Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the trade subcommittee, said. "What's happening here is that we've had years of a passive trade approach from this administration. They have had a mindless policy that even if trade is one sided, it's better than nothing."

Hey Sander.  Not only this administration, but the one or two or three before it.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >