One of the worst China drug scandals PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Thursday, 31 January 2008

Many, many companies in China are owned by the government.  Communism is, after all, government ownership of private assets.  

One of those government-owned companies, Shanghai Hualian, is a very large drug maker.  It has many plants.  Dozens of plants, some of which supply the U.S. It manufactures cancer drugs, mifeprepristone (RU-486 - the abortion pill) among others. 

Some of those drugs were contaminated, a leukemia drug, methotrexate. 200 Chinese cancer patients were parylized or otherwise harmed.  When?  Last summer.  When did the contamination become public?  Today. Months and months later.

What did the Chinese FDA equivalent agency do?  Good question.

The director of the Chinese F.D.A.’s drug safety control unit in Shanghai, Zhou Qun, said her agency had inspected the factory that produced mifepristone three times in recent months and found it in compliance. “It is natural to worry,” Ms. Zhou said, “but these two plants are in two different places and have different quality-assurance people.”

Yes.  But the same regulator.  And the same regulatory culture. 

Remember what happened to the last head of the Chinese FDA?  He was executed by his employer.  But before his government execution, his agency was very productive.  They approved 7,500 new drugs each workday.  7,500 new drugs each workday.

The U.S. FDA approved 140 last year.

Trackbacks (0) TrackBack URI for this entry
Comments (0)add feed
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Related Articles

In the news

Key Flaws in the Bailout Legislation

On compensation, which is central to reforming the banks, and equity participation, which is essential for insulating the taxpayers from loss, the legislation is not what is being advertized by the Administration and the Speaker.

The bailout hardly restricts executive compensation. Those provisions are vague, except for golden parachutes, and really only apply to banks the government would take over.

For banks and securities companies that sell bad assets to the Treasury through the normal auction process, restrictions on compensation really only apply to golden parachutes for the top five officers--compensation that only applies if the banks fail and the CEO is pushed out. Restrictions on compensation do not apply to work performed by incumbent employees until a bank goes bust.

Hence the banks will be free to continue to pay excecutives through bonus systems that encourage reckless decisions as and get banks in further trouble. Only after banks get in trouble again, can the government get involved in compensation and management practices.

The same flaws apply to government warrants (equity positions in the banks).

If the government buys $100 billion of toxic paper from Citigroup, for example, and Citigroup recovers for now, the government will be able to do little to alter its management practices or participate in the benefits of its recovery. Only if Citigroup fails, after the bankers have been paid again, will the government be able to get involved in its business practices or get an equity stake--only when the bank is near worthless.