Value Added Taxes getting publicity PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Sunday, 06 January 2008

A major part of our trade deficit is caused by taxes.  Every trade agreement is a unilateral disarmament of the U.S.  We drop our tariffs, they drop some tariffs (usually more slowly) and they continue imposing a 17% tax on our exports to them.  Read the CPA policy on value added - or consumption - taxes for more details. 

Mike Huckabee is proposing a national sales tax, dubbed a "Fair Tax".  It's getting more attention because Huckabee won Iowa.  A New York Times article today has a good discussion about who is saying what about the proposal.

The positives are that we can neutralize foreign VAT tariffs by having our own.  We can rebate it when our businesses export (just like other countries do) and we can charge the tax when products are imported (just like other countries do).  Then the VAT tariffs are no longer an issue.

But taxes are a partisan issue.  Partisanship is the kiss of death for most issues, especially in a divided government.  Some Republicans want to use a national sales tax as a way to cut taxes.  But the U.S. is not over-taxed in comparison with other OECD countries.  Many Democrats believe taxing income is inherently fair because of progressivity.  But a national sales tax can be made just as progressive as the income tax, I'm told.

The Times article points out other objections, which need to be addressed.

“The main weakness of the FairTax is its comprehensiveness,” said Dale W. Jorgenson, an economist at Harvard who opposes the plan but whose research into problems with the current system is sometimes cited by supporters. “It tries to roll everything into one tax, which simply can’t carry all that weight.”

I don't know if that is true, but I'll not mock him because I simply don't know.  And there is the "black market" incentive:

Whatever the rate, critics say, a steep federal retail tax, piled on top of existing state sales taxes, would encourage widespread illegal tax evasion, black market transactions and other forms of cheating, creating a cycle that would require even higher tax rates.

Tax cheating exists now, and it will always exist.  We could have a "War on Tax Cheating" because the "War on..." is such an attractive rallying cry for politicians.  But the real issue is the marginal difference between the types of tax cheating. 

CPA will be doing more work on this issue during 2008.

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev

Related Articles

In the news

The following article was written by Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Business and former Chief Economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.  

The Treasury is injecting another $27 billion into AIG and raising the taxpayers’ investment to $150 billon. Secretary Paulson appears more intent on helping his pals on Wall Street than protecting taxpayer interests.

Read more...