The "Crude Tool" vs. the "Impotent Tool" PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Friday, 14 December 2007

Not good headlines for Hank's SED®:

Boston Globe:  US, China trade talks produce little

Washington Post: U.S.-China Talks Build Trust, but No Major Deals

NY Times: U.S.-China Trade Talks Conclude With Modest Deals and Mutual Wariness

Washington Times: China's currency defiance

Peter Morici: China's dragon does not flinch

Susan Schwab tells Congress to stay out of the way because the administration is working on it, and that legislation was a "crude tool".  Better, I think, than no tool at all.

Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add
feedSubscribe to this comment's feed
0
...
written by Burl Finkelstein , December 14, 2007
US leadership has proven itself to be in the pocket of allteh profit makers and not the US citizenery on the issue of trade. The economicly self sufficent soceity that was built by 200 years of har work is being destroyed by a copule decades of greed diven policy.
We are simply morons in dealing with China on trade. The dont let our products in charge taxes on whtat is impiorted into China. They give substantial incentives to expost to the US. They do what ever they want on labot and envirnmental enforcement. They encorage technology to develop in thier country. We do NOTHING. We let manufacturing slip away, we let out youth be satisfied with carreers as waiters. We tellt eh public that we are a service soceity.

The Schumer Graham tarrif bill gets better looking all the time. If we do not like what a tading partner is doing THEN WE SHOULD DO SOMETHING NOW. letting the status quo continue demonstrates who is in control.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
[ Back ]