|
PRES: China policy in Dem presidential debate |
|
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Tuesday, 04 December 2007 |
|
1. Trade and China policy is on the upswing for Dem presidential candidate attention. Here is the wrapup from the NPR radio debate today.
Urging a Tougher China Policy
Trade has also become a major concern for American voters, even in
Iowa, which enjoys a large trade surplus with the rest of the world.
Many Democrats are skeptical that globalization is positive for the
U.S. economy. Several of the candidates said the government should take
a tougher line against China.
"We have not been the best negotiators, and often times, we're
negotiating on behalf of Wall Street instead of Main Street," Obama
said.
Edwards echoed that view, saying big corporations are driving American
policy toward China. "They get their way and the American people lose."
Clinton responded to a young mother's question about dangerous toys
from China, saying the Bush administration has "essentially defanged
the Consumer Products Safety Commission."
Edwards and Dodd, who both have young children, vowed not to buy any
Chinese-made toys this Christmas. "My toys are coming from Iowa," Dodd
joked.
(Read more)
2. Clinton wants to take a "hard look" at the WTO before continuing talks - from BNA. Subscription only.
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) said Nov. 30 that, as president, she
would take a "hard look" at the World Trade Organization negotiations
"to see what works and what doesn't work" before engaging further in
the talks.
Clinton said that the so-called "trade time-out" that she has
previously proposed would not necessarily apply to the WTO talks. But
she did say that, if elected, she would not "pick up" where the Bush
administration left off.
"There is nothing protectionist about this," Clinton said in an
interview with the Financial Times. "It is a responsible course. The
alternative is simply to pick up where President Bush left off, and
that's not an option."
A transcript of Clinton's remarks was released on Dec. 3.
Clinton, who is the national front-runner for the Democratic
presidential nomination, also said that she is not calling for a
"totally different" approach to trade than has been taken in the past
but merely saying that "we have to take stock of where we are today."
"We have benefited through most of the 20th century from trade,"
Clinton said. "It has helped to raise American standards of living. It
has helped to create jobs."
She said that current "provisions"--without elaborating--prevent
countries from enforcing strong environmental and worker-safety rules
under the WTO. "I think we have to take a hard look at this and do it
in the right way," she said, "and that is what I am proposing to do."
3. The Dem-supporting blog, DailyKos, has this expanded version of the Dem debate answers on China and trade:
Second Topic: China
Question: Given China's size, manufacturing, military, etc. Who has more leverage -- China or the US?
Edwards: US has two long term challenges, terrorism and China.
Bush has done nothing about China. We know little about what
they're doing with their military, propping up bad regimes,
polluting. They're growing, America is stronger, but we need to
engage China.
Obama: Three issues: 1. Get our own fiscal house in order. 2.
China making huge inroads in Africa while US is absent. 3. We
don't negotiate well, they are competitors. We negotiation for
Wall Street instead of Main Street. US still superpower, but need
to think of 10-50 years from now.
Kucinich: Only one here who voted against China trade. We're
borrowing money from China to pay for war in Iraq. We need to
stop arms race, get them to transition our of nuclear and coal.
Clinton: We have more leverage, but we're not using it. Bush
policies have handicapped us. Need a coherent strategic
relationship, or China will have the leverage.
Question: If our balance of trade is upside down with China, why not
put on a tarrif and keep the American people from buying cheap Chinese
goods.
Biden: With WTO guidelines we could stop these products now.
China isn't that great, has many people in poverty. We've yielded
to corporate America and the Bush view of trade. Not willing to
go to tarrifs, just enforce the law.
Dodd: Adversarial relationship. Slave labor. Not a competition. We need to enforce existing laws.
Question: How do we level the playing field?
Obama: Dodd and Biden had good point on laws. We're still
treating them as if they were a poor country. Japan makes China
follow their rules to get to their market. We haven't used the
tools we have. US companies have moved there and are shipping
here and are special interests.
Edwards: Corporate America driving this issue. Enforce laws that
exist here and at WTO. Not being done because corporate America
driving trade policy. No push to buy local. Will not buy
Chinese toys for his kids.
Dodd (?): My toys are coming from Iowa. My kids are eating Iowa food.
Obama: We're not using the power that we have. US companies have
moved to China and are shipping things back here to take advantage of
low wages and weak environmental policy. Not every single trade
policy should be based on what's good for corporations.
Gravel: China has only increased military 10%. Our rhetoric of
"beggar thy neighbor" is shameful. American companies also dump
things abroad.
Question: If we do what you've said, will Americans pay more?
Kucinich: Buy American or bye-bye America. (And guess friggin'
what) I'm the only one up here who voted against China trade.
Obama: China will modify their behavior if we stand up to them.
Question: Chemicals in products cause cancer, birth defects, and we
don't make manufacturers list ingredients. What will you change?
Clinton: We don't do enough to prevent dangerous products, either
imports or domestic. We don't track exposures. Need tougher
standards across the boards.
Dodd: 80% of food is imported, very little labeling.
Trackback(0)
|
|
In the news
|
Washington, October 22, 2008 - Keith Bolin, ACGA President and Bureau Co., IL farmer and hog producer, announces the American Corn Growers 22nd Annual Convention in Coralville, IA, January 15-16, 2009 at the Marriott Hotel and Conference Center. "Food, Conservation, Energy & Trade 2009" will boast a line-up of well-known industry leaders who will address the current policies and practices of food, conservation, energy and trade.
Find more information on this event here. |
|