77% China subsidies found in tubing PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Wednesday, 28 November 2007

David Brooks, Tom Friedman can hurl their "protectionist" insults over the Pacific.  The International Trade Commission found China subsidizes a particular sub-part of its metal tubing industry by up to 77%.

A press release appears below the fold with some details.

Schagrin Associates
900 Seventh Street, NW Suite 500
Washington, DC  20001
202-223-1700

*************

PRESS RELEASE

U.S. Light Walled Rectangular Steel Tubing Producers Support Affirmative Commerce Department Subsidy Finding Against Imports From China

For Immediate Release                   November 27, 2007

Contact information:    Roger Schagrin, Schagrin Associates  (202) 223-1700
            Tamara Browne, Schagrin Associates (202) 223-1700

_______________________________________________________________________

    Washington, D.C. – Today thirteen U.S. producers of light-walled rectangular steel tubing, known in the industry as ornamental tubing, applauded the Department of Commerce for its preliminary countervailing duty (CVD) finding that the Government of China has been subsidizing their Chinese competitors.
    In its preliminary determination, the Commerce Department determined subsidies of 0.27 to 77.85 percent.  The average rate applied to all other Chinese exporters will be 2.99 percent.
    Lee Searing, President of Searing Industries, Rancho Cucamonga, California stated “Our family owned company and our employees can not compete with the billions of dollars of government subsidized steel production in China and the direct subsidies to tubing producers.  This is a welcome first step in leveling the playing field for U.S. producers.”


    Light-walled rectangular tubing is used in construction, ornamental fencing, and in furniture and a myriad of other products.  Parry Katsafanas, President of Leavitt Tube LLC, Chicago, Illinois stated “Our company’s Jackson, Mississippi plant is focused almost exclusively on producing these products.  Our production and employment there have been hammered by unfairly traded imports from China, as well as dumped imports into the Gulf Coast from Mexico, Turkey and Korea.  It is important to our company to impose these duties so our production, employment and profits improve.”
    The China CVD case was filed on June 27, 2007 along with anti-dumping cases against China, Korea, Mexico and Turkey.  The petitioners were: Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation, Harvey, Illinois; Atlas Tube, Plymouth, Michigan; Bull Moose Tube, St. Louis Missouri; California Steel and Tube, City of Industry, California, EXLTUBE, North Kansas City, Missouri; Hannibal Industries, Los Angeles, California; Leavitt Tube Company LLC, Chicago, Illinois; Maruichi American Corporation, Santa Fe Springs, California; Searing Industries, Rancho Cucamonga, California; Southland Tube, Birmingham, Alabama; Vest, Inc., Los Angeles, California; Welded Tube, Delta, Ohio and Huger, South Carolina and Western Tube & Conduit, Long Beach, California.
    John Montgomery Jr., Executive Vice President of Southland Tube, Birmingham, Alabama, stated “This is very important initial relief for our family owned company and our workers.  We would also like to thank our U.S. Representative, Artur Davis, and our U.S. Senators, Jeff Sessions and Richard Shelby, for their tireless efforts to get the anti-subsidy laws applied to China.”


    Imports from the four countries increased from 180,720 tons in 2004 to 315,305 tons in 2006, or by 74.5 percent.  In particular, imports of ornamental tubing from China increased from 8,859 tons in 2004 to 80,466 tons through September 2007.
    Roger B. Schagrin of Schagrin Associates, a Washington D.C. law firm that is counsel to the petitioners stated “I compliment the Secretary of Commerce and his staff for working their way through complex and novel issues in their application of the countervailing duty law to China.  We are hopeful that these rates will increase after Commerce verifies the Chinese producer responses.  However, after twenty-six years of representing U.S. producers in trade litigation it is imperative that this industry win its injury case next spring at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to ensure that these duties remain in effect.”
    The Department of Commerce will announce its preliminary dumping determination against these same imports from China, and from Korea, Mexico and Turkey on January 24, 2008.  The final determinations in all cases will be 75 or 135 days later. The ITC will issue final injury determinations 45 days after the final Commerce decisions.
 

Trackbacks (0) TrackBack URI for this entry
Comments (0)add feed
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy
 
< Prev   Next >