WaPo hypocricy on sovereignty PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Thursday, 11 October 2007

The Washington Post editorial board is a favorite punching bag of mine.  They are irrevocably self deluded on free trade.  If a document has one page or 1,000 pages, they like it if the words "Free Trade Agreement" are positioned at the top of the first page, in capitals and bold letters.

But the WaPo folks don't want the International Court of Justice to trump U.S. law.  They titled their editorial, a weighty and serious, "The Law of the Land."  Fine with me. 

But what about NAFTA, CAFTA and the WTO agreements that can or have stricken many U.S. laws?  Far more U.S. laws than the ICJ has ever thought to challenge.  What about that?

Anyone?  Anyone?

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

In the news

The following, written by Professor Ralph Gomory of New York University's Stern School of Business and former President of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, appeared in the Huffington Post on December 16, 2008 and can be accessed here. 

Autopia: A Tale of Two Bailouts

Many Americans are struggling to understand how our government makes decisions on corporate bailouts. When Wall Street companies spent years investing in mortgages that turned out, essentially, to be garbage, the government rushed to bail them out. But when the auto companies neared a similar fate, the government was prepared to stand by and let them perish.

To aid in understanding this situation, it is helpful to look at an example from a galaxy far, far away.


Read more...