Independent lab "testing" in China PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Wednesday, 19 September 2007

Chinese government and companies sometimes say we will have our labs test products for safety, then you will trust us.  But now we see that does not work either. 

More toy recalls are hiding behind the corporate curtains in the U.S. - Target, Dollar General, and Discount School Supply for example.  These companies have found lead painted toys, but have not announced it because the Consumer Product Safety Commission is investigating or negotiating recall terms.

Shalom International imports jewelry in New York.  It recalled 280,000 children's rings this year though a Chinese testing lab it hired in December - CMA Testing and Certification Laboratories in Hong Kong - allegedly tested and passed the goods.

“You can’t trust the Chinese to do what they say they are doing,” Mr. Green [V.P. of Shalom] said. “They all say, ‘We are using lead-free paint and lead-free components.’ Experience shows they are not.”


There are a lot of ways to say you are testing, but are not really testing

Do you wipe the painted surface for dust?  If there is no dust, you don't get lead.  Do you test paint chips?  If so, do you you use "Atomic Spectrometry" to show the volume of lead in a sample, or the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) to determine how the lead would leach out in a landfill?

Do you use standardized collection methods for collecting samples?  Do you use standard practice to prepare the sample for testing? 

Is a portable XRF instrument used?  Is that instrument operated according to accepted procedures?  Was substrate correction done?  What units are the results reported in?

Were the lab technicians trained properly?  Was contamination of the sample avoided?

There are a lot of ways to say you are "testing", but you are not.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >