The Harmonization of Standards Lie PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Tuesday, 11 September 2007

Harmonization of standards is generally a lie in free trade agreements. China has strong standards against lead paint, stronger than the U.S. standards.  Indeed, China allows only 90 parts per million (ppm) in paint, while the U.S. allows 600 ppm.  But there is no enforcement.  The rules are written on paper somewhere, but so what.

Mattel thought they were getting a cheap toy deal from China, and vigorously outsourced.  But paint with lead in China is one-third cheaper than unleaded paint.  So the manufacturers bought the lead paint.

A nice quote comes from that linked article.

“The standard doesn’t matter,” said Scott Clark, a professor of environmental health at the University of Cincinnati. “Remember, in the Soviet Union during the cold war, they had very high standards on the books, but they never enforced them. It was just for show.”

Its not just China using the lead paint, it is India and Malaysia too.

Mattel says "its not our fault."  But David Barboza reported this quote from an unnamed China source.

“It depends on the client’s requirement,” she said. “If the prices they offer make it impossible to use lead-free paint, we’ll tell them that we might have to use leaded paint. If they agree, we’ll use leaded paint. It totally depends on what the clients want.”

Mattel's plausible deniability becomes less plausible.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

In the news

The following article was written by Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Business and former Chief Economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.  

The Treasury is injecting another $27 billion into AIG and raising the taxpayers’ investment to $150 billon. Secretary Paulson appears more intent on helping his pals on Wall Street than protecting taxpayer interests.

Read more...