Sherrod Brown on trade PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Tuesday, 04 September 2007

Sherrod Brown gets it on trade.  The nice thing is that he got elected on trade, showing that the polls of the populace translate into elected candidates.

Thomas Friedman may like every trade agreement he has ever seen, and his regular columnist position at the New York Times gives him a broad reach.  But, ultimately, he has only one vote.  And no vote in 49 of the states.

Just so you know what I mean about Friedman, he was caught on tape saying this:

"We got this free market, and I admit, I was speaking out in Minnesota--my hometown, in fact, and guy stood up in the audience, said, `Mr. Friedman, is there any free trade agreement you'd oppose?' I said, `No, absolutely not.' I said, `You know what, sir? I wrote a column supporting the CAFTA, the Caribbean Free Trade initiative. I didn't even know what was in it. I just knew two words: free trade." 

Brown's op-ed appeared in yesterday's Cincinnati Enquirer.  The full op-ed is below the fold.  But here are a couple notable quotes, as he defends protecting America.

Some 40 percent of the economy is still government-owned and provides a continuing source of revenue and employment. These state-owned enterprises enjoy a wide variety of government-provided subsidies, from cheap land, below-market rate loans and loan forgiveness, to lax enforcement of environmental laws and worker protections. American-owned corporations also enjoy many of these benefits and are able to make products in China for export at an artificially low cost, which can inevitably make these corporations beholden to the various governments and to the Communist Party for many subsidies.

We do not compete with Chinese companies.  We compete with their government.  The colonists at the Boston Tea Party protested because the East India Company/British Government joint venture was imposed upon them through parliamentary decision making.  China's economy is the East India Company on steroids.

And here's a good thing.

This fall I will introduce legislation to require enforceable country-of-origin labeling on imported food. The law already mandates some country-of-origin labeling but the Bush administration, at the behest of large beef processors, has refused to enforce it. My bill will also require importers of record to post a safety bond of insurance to protect themselves - and the public - from hugely expensive product recalls and liability.

We fought the meat packer lobby long and hard just to get country of origin labeling on a few foodstuffs: meat, produce and seafood.  It's the law, but the packer lobbyists prevented it from being implemented for meat and produce. 

Do you find yourself looking at labels more these days?  Your shrimp, for example?  Or catfish?  If U.S. companies want to sell cheap food from countries without regulation, they can inform us even as they make their profits. 

*** Cincinnati Enquirer 9/2/07
 
Trade? Yes, but demand product safety
U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH)


Anyone who disagrees with America's trade experts is labeled a protectionist. As if that's a bad word.

What is wrong with United States trade policy protecting American workers? Or protecting our communities? Or how about our trade laws protecting our families from unsafe Chinese food imports or our children from toys coated with lead-based paint?

Last year, the United States imported $288 billion of goods - much of it food, toys, and ingredients for toothpaste, vitamins, and dog food - from the People's Republic of China, a country with weak and unenforced health and safety regulations. And as recent news reports document, tens of millions of dangerous toys are being recalled, contaminated dog food is being destroyed, and cough syrup and vitamins are suspect; there are even warnings about children's books.

Our country has worked hard to build safe work places, a reliably healthy food supply, and pure drinking water. For a hundred years, legislators and governors, county commissioners and senators, have taken on some of the world's most powerful corporations - chemical companies, agribusinesses, automakers - to make our cars safer and our air and food cleaner.

Unrestricted, unregulated free trade with China - with no protections - threatens these gains and jeopardizes our public health.

There is little interest among the Chinese in changing the way we and they do business. Why would they when China's bilateral trade surplus with the United States may approach $300 billion this year? The Chinese government at all levels - and the Communist Party - resist jeopardizing the flow of profits into government treasuries and the pockets of party officials and government authorities.

Some 40 percent of the economy is still government-owned and provides a continuing source of revenue and employment. These state-owned enterprises enjoy a wide variety of government-provided subsidies, from cheap land, below-market rate loans and loan forgiveness, to lax enforcement of environmental laws and worker protections. American-owned corporations also enjoy many of these benefits and are able to make products in China for export at an artificially low cost, which can inevitably make these corporations beholden to the various governments and to the Communist Party for many subsidies.

So what is to be done? Since the Communist government has ruled out third-party inspections and U.S. consumer product and food inspectors on Chinese soil, we have two choices - either buy less, much less from China or license certain importers and hold them responsible for the safety of the products they bring into our country.

This fall I will introduce legislation to require enforceable country-of-origin labeling on imported food. The law already mandates some country-of-origin labeling but the Bush administration, at the behest of large beef processors, has refused to enforce it. My bill will also require importers of record to post a safety bond of insurance to protect themselves - and the public - from hugely expensive product recalls and liability.

In addition, we need to increase the number of inspectors at the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Agriculture, and the Consumer Products Safety Commission. And stop hiring inspectors who used to work for the regulating industry or have plans to return there.

Everyone agrees: We all want more trade with countries across the world. But let's protect the safety and health of our children and our families first.

Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Avon, Ohio, is a U.S. senator representing Ohio.
 

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >