Does foreign investment offset the trade deficit job loss? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Thursday, 23 August 2007

The Economic Policy Institute debunks Henry Paulson. Rob Scott does good work.  The summary of his recent report is below.

 

 Foreign Companies in U.S. Reduce American Jobs

Stung by criticism over the loss of U.S. jobs abroad, some prominent officials and economists have countered with claims that the United States is gaining jobs as a result of direct investments made in the United States by foreign companies, a process referred to as “insourcing.” Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson recently declared that U.S. affiliates of foreign companies “bring investments to our shores, creating jobs and revitalizing communities.” But a new Economic Policy Institute report shows that foreign companies operating in the United States have actually reduced their payroll employment by 4 million jobs since 1990, and that insourcing is not creating American jobs.

[hit "read more"]


 
EPI senior economist Robert Scott analyzes trends of total U.S. payroll employment of foreign multinational corporations, and shows how officials like Paulson, who are claiming these companies create jobs, don’t present the full picture. Scott examined Commerce Department data on employment related to new foreign investment in the United States and finds foreign acquisitions of ongoing U.S firms—not new startups—account for the vast majority of employment associated with new foreign investments.
 
But many foreign investment proponents are often counting these already-existing jobs as if they are new ones just because of a change in ownership. What’s more, Scott contends, this insourcing trend has seen many of these companies buy U.S, firms, layoff U.S. workers and send jobs and production overseas. Chinese computer maker Lenovo, for example, shut down IBM’s domestic laptop production and replaced it with imports from China.
 
“It is disingenuous to look at what the data say and claim American employment is being created from foreign investment,” Scott said. “It all really points to job reduction.”
 
In 1990, U.S. affiliates of foreign multinational corporations employed 3.84 million workers. Between 1991 and 2005, the Commerce Department shows foreign multinational corporations acquired U.S. firms employing 4.94 million workers, and began new startups employing only 303,000 workers. All told, this amounts to 9.09 million jobs. But due to layoffs and sell-offs of U.S. companies during this time, these firms actually employed just 5.09 million workers as of 2005, hence 4-million jobs either lost or sold back to U.S. firms.
 
Scott’s report also shows the big economic and trade picture by explaining how foreign multinationals taking over U.S. companies contribute to the soaring U.S. trade deficit and the flood of imports this country receives. The U.S. trade deficits of foreign-owned firms more than tripled, from $79 billion to $283 billion, or 14.3% per year, from 1990 to 2005.  These firms were responsible for 36.1% of the total U.S. trade deficit in 2005. 

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >