New York Times Editorial Board in denial PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Wednesday, 15 August 2007

The New York Times Editorial Board is a major opponent of enforcing trade rules.  Any proposal to enforce rules are called, by the Board, "protectionist" and an effort to "erect a barricade."

Their editorial today shows the quandary they face between unthinking "free trade" advocacy, and their concern for safety and economic strength.  They denounce the lack of quality in China, but say it is not in our interest to start a "trade war."

Did someone propose a trade war?  I can't recall that.  Did someone propose "erecting barriers?"  No.  

But we do propose enforcing rules prohibiting unfair trade practices and neutralizing currency manipulation.  We do propose eliminating the mercantilist effects of border adjustable taxes used by more than 140 of our trading partners.

Can someone please join an intelligent debate, and graduate from junior high? 

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

In the news

Washington, October 22, 2008 - Keith Bolin, ACGA President and Bureau Co., IL farmer and hog producer, announces the American Corn Growers 22nd Annual Convention in Coralville, IA, January 15-16, 2009 at the Marriott Hotel and Conference Center. "Food, Conservation, Energy & Trade 2009" will boast a line-up of well-known industry leaders who will address the current policies and practices of food, conservation, energy and trade.  

Find more information on this event here.