|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Monday, 13 August 2007 |
|
My thoughts turn to scenarios, upon considering the China "nuclear
option." Then I think of Taiwan, one of the more likely friction
points. If China seeks military re-unification by taking over
Taiwan, then does the U.S. intervene? If so, China sells its
Treasury Bonds, our economy tanks in a time of war.
Someone else had this thought in the Harvard Magazine:
The nightmare scenario, says Mohamed El-Erian, who as chief
executive officer and president of Harvard Management Company (HMC)
oversees the investment of Harvards $30-billion endowment, includes
the possibility, for example, that Taiwan does something to upset
China; the U.S. allies itself fully with Taiwan; and you have a
political crisis with economic implications. A conflict over the
Taiwan Strait, agrees Abdelal, could lead China to diversify quickly
out of dollars. I think that things could turn out very badly, very
quickly.
Idle speculation? We did it to Britain in 1954. With revolutionary consequences.
That last ideathat nations can wield power through their
accumulation of currency reservesis rooted in our own history. When
President Dwight D. Eisenhower learned in 1956 that Britain, in
collusion with France and Israel, had invaded Egypt without U.S.
knowledge, he was infuriated. Many people remember Suez, notes
Jeffrey Frankel, Harpel professor of capital formation and growth at
the Kennedy School of Government (KSG), but few recall the specific
way that Eisenhower forced the British to back down. At the time,
there was a run on the pound sterling and he blocked the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) from stabilizing the currency. With sterling on the
verge of collapse, says Frankel, Eisenhower told them, We are not
going to bail out the pound unless you pull out of Suez. Facing
bankruptcy, the British withdrew. This incident, notes Frankel, marked
the end of Great Britains ability to conduct an independent foreign
policy.
Trackback(0)
|
|