DEFICIT? WHICH DEFICIT! PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sara Haimowitz   
Wednesday, 16 September 2009

by

Milt Heft
Petrogen, Inc.
P.O. Box 75610
Colorado Springs, CO 80970-5610

Much has been said about “the deficit” without clearly identifying exactly what is being discussed.   There are TWO kinds of federal deficits.  One is totally within the control of our Federal Government to manage, but the other is an untamed beast that is permitted to run loose and is potentially lethal to our society.  Unfortunately, public attention is riveted on the easily controllable deficit, while the extremely dangerous one continues out of control, ignoring the perfectly reasonable techniques that could eliminate its threat.  

 

THE CONTROLLABLE DEFICIT

The more visible and publicly debated deficit is an internal matter that is the function of too much government spending and not enough federal government taxing.  It originates in the Federal Government’s power to print money.  With the power to print money, the Feds can spend first and tax later.  In fact, they might be able to spend without taxing at all.  That happened in the first 100 years of our country when taxing was quite minimal.  For many years Federal taxation was fairly limited to import tariffs.  The result might have been horrendous inflation except for the fact that our country was growing, expanding, and producing more and more goods.  As long as the printed money did not exceed the pace of increasing production, there was little inflation and no need to tax.

But that is not where we now are.  This seems to be the age of bailouts and stimulus packages.  Meanwhile, our production is actually decreasing because of unprecedented outsourcing of manufacturing.  The Federal spending is far outpacing the tax revenues,  on top of which there are less domestically produced goods to buy. Heavy inflation is the eventual result of these policies – or lack of policies.

This is the deficit that is described variously as the debt we owe ourselves, or, the debt we are passing on to our children, or , The National Debt.  The reason this excessive printing of money is called “borrowing” instead of “printing” is because of the legal fiction that exists between the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve.  The Federal Reserve is the actual printer of the money, but they are responding to so-called bonds issued by Treasury that is the Federal Reserve’s authority to start the printing presses.

This is all nonsense.  There is nothing at all that resembles a debt from anyone to anyone.  The result of printing money, and not taxing, is inflation.  Unless there are increasingly more domestically-produced goods to buy. 

This is the deficit that is totally controllable. It can be controlled by printing less money (curtailing Federal Spending), taxing more (taking more money out of circulation), or producing more goods.  If these controls are not exercised, the unstoppable result is inflation.

THE OTHER DEFICIT

The more serious deficit comes from an imbalance in international trade and finance.  There are two aspects to this balance:  1) balance of trade, and 2) balance of payments.

Balance of trade is easy to imagine:  two countries purchase each other’s goods and the relative value of these goods are equal, as determined by the exchange rates between the currencies of these two countries.  It may be that there is not a balance in the goods exchanged, but the difference can be made up by profits brought home by the lesser producer.  It doesn’t matter; as long as the currencies are equally exchanged as defined by their exchange value.

If the trade is not equal, and a country accumulates an excess of a second country‘s currency, that is a deficit to the second country.  It is a completely different deficit than the deficit incurred by spending more than is taxed. It is different and less controllable,  and potentially more devastating than the inflation of case #1.

The United States today is running an international trade deficit.  It does not have enough returns from foreign investment to compensate for the tremendous trade disparity.  This deficit can not be neutralized by increased internal taxation.  It has nothing to do with our money supply or our Federal spending. 

The danger of a constant international deficit is that more and more of our dollars are being held by foreigners (did we mention China yet?).  Theoretically, China can make these dollars available to the rest of the world by putting them on the international exchange market.  Another possibility is that perhaps China will use these dollars to buy American goods and thereby return to an equal balance of trade. China does neither; it simply keeps our dollars and buys our T-bills with them.

The problem here is that America no longer produces much that is wanted by any foreign country.  American production has voluntarily shut down and moved to China.  In the last 10 years over 40,000 American factories have closed and moved mostly to China, but also to Mexico and other low-cost producing areas.  With 40,000 factory closings over 4 million factory jobs have also been lost. With the service-to-production ratio of about 3:1, this accounts for an unemployment figure of 12 million.

This is the deficit, the untamed  beast that is NOT talked about.  This is the one that will turn around and bite us. This is the one that is out of control.  This one can not be fixed by less spending or more taxing.  This can only be fixed by less importing and more exporting. The problem can also be fixed by forcing (or persuading) certain foreign countries to allow their currencies to float freely in the international market, and stopping their controlled, under-valuation which makes it attractive to buy their artificially low-priced goods.  It is estimated that the controlled Chinese yuan is artificially held at a  value about 45% below market.  Allowing it to float would increase the price of Chinese goods by 45% and thereby reduce foreign purchases of Chinese goods and restore some balance to the balance of trade.  It might come as profound shock to our millions who have become accustomed to the artificially low Walmart prices.  Our trade negociators who are trying to persuade China to allow the yuan to float are probably very fearful that they might succeed.

One might well ask why the Chinese are promoting exports at a low dollar price, in order to obtain US dollars which they obviously do not want.  They buy almost nothing from us and instead take their dollars back to our Treasury and buy our T-Bills.  Whatever their reason, they are surely destroying our industrial capacity as effectively as a most successful bombing campaign.

Because so many of our industries have moved to China, and because we now have so little to export, the value of our dollar is so low that foreigners find it very profitable to buy these cheap dollars and come back to the USA and buy our companies and our real estate.  It is easy enough to visit the internet and with just a bit of smart probing you can find out how much of our wealth is now controlled by foreigners, with absolutely no federal control over this invasion.

Our federal government has permitted this to happen, and only our federal government can stop the bleeding.  And yet, there is almost nothing being done except periodic visits to China by our Secretary of State, and our Secretary of the Treasury, to plead with the Chinese to continue buying our T-Bills.

What can possibly be in the minds of our leaders. What can they possibly see as the outcome of this intolerable situation.

The problem cuts across party lines.  The problem started in the Clinton administration, was continued by the Bush administration, and is not yet being addressed by the Obama administration.  Who is representing the American people in this struggle for economic survival?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Join the Coalition for a Prosperous America

 

EconomyInCrisis.org

Buy American Project

SaveAnAmericanJob.com

What is TradeReform.Org?

TradeReform.Org is a blog created and sponsored by the Coalition for a Prosperous America that discusses U.S. trade policy. The posts and commentary are not necessarily the official policy or views of CPA.  We encourage participation and lively debate.

Latest Comments

Bob Powell:
Stupak urges Congres...
Adding insult to inj...

Frank Shannon:
Obama Outlines Drive...
As we learned yester...

Bob Powell:
Stupak urges Congres...
NAFTA has been an ec...

Robert Johns:
Remarks of President...
An export program th...

Mo:
Evergreen Solar Head...
I mentioned Currency...

John Hastings:
PA-12: Murtha's rep...
Critz is not the onl...

China Watcher:
Evergreen Solar Head...
Mo misses the two bi...

Mo:
China Says U.S. Abus...
Unfortuantely these ...

Mo:
Evergreen Solar Head...
Once again costs to ...

Frank Shannon:
China Says U.S. Abus...
Applying duties prod...

Syndicate