We could lead in high tech, but we're stupid PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Tuesday, 16 September 2008

In the past - like 2 years ago - we did not need agriculture and manufacturing, because of comparative advantage.  Y'know, the comparative advantage of China and other countries using slave labor, low capital, high labor hours, no regulation, shoddy workmanship, horrendous pollution, and dirty diesel to make and ship the product 8,000 across the world.  That comparative advantage. 

Not Ricardo's comparative advantage... lest you be confused.  Ricardo's comparative advantage works, according to Ricardo, only when labor and capital are not mobile.

So let's look at high tech.  Batteries... for example

But much more needs to be done, says Mary Ann Wright, vice president and general manager for Johnson Controls' hybrid-battery business. She has been lobbying Washington for a national effort to establish research labs and manufacturing technology to make the U.S. a battery-manufacturing leader.

It would be more of rebirth of an industry than one started from scratch. Key components needed in hybrid and electric vehicles -- including the battery, electric motor and specialized electronics -- were originally developed in the U.S., Ms. Wright says. Now nearly all of them come from Asia.

"It's our punishment for inventing this stuff and allowing manufacturing to go somewhere else," she says.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev

In the news

The following article was written by Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Business and former Chief Economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.  

The Treasury is injecting another $27 billion into AIG and raising the taxpayers’ investment to $150 billon. Secretary Paulson appears more intent on helping his pals on Wall Street than protecting taxpayer interests.

Read more...