13 yrs for FDA to inspect foreign drug plants PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Thursday, 14 February 2008

Poisonous heparin is the latest Chinese product to harm our citizens.  350 people became ill from the heparin, which is a common blood thinner injected into our bodies by our doctors in our hospitals.

The article also mentions a GAO report I missed.  The report had these happy facts:

The Government Accountability Office recently reported that at its current inspection pace, the F.D.A. would need at least 13 years to inspect every foreign drug plant that exports products to the United States. The office, an independent arm of Congress, also found that the F.D.A.’s computer systems were deficient and it had little idea how many plants had been approved for exports to the United States.

Wow. 

UPDATE: The FDA violated its own rules by approving the plant to sell heparin without inspecting that plant.  "It was obviously a glitch," said the FDA.  No.  Its a big freaking deal.

Dr. Ajay Singh, director of dialysis at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, said he was astonished by what he called the many failures to ensure a safe supply of heparin. There are 450,000 people in the United States on dialysis, and nearly all of them need copious doses of heparin, he said. Heparin is also used in cardiac surgery and among chronic care patients.

“We need to ensure that this country has access to the crucial medicines it needs,” Dr. Singh said. “This is a national security issue.”

 
Obama on trade PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Wednesday, 13 February 2008

Just chronicling the candidates' talk on our issues.  Obama today in Wisconsin:

While campaigning in Wisconsin, Obama took his own shots at Clinton, criticizing her for supporting the North America Free Trade Agreement while former President Clinton was president.

"You know, in the years after her husband signed NAFTA, Sen. Clinton would go around talking about how great it was and how many benefits it would bring," Obama said in Janesville, Wisconsin. "Now that she's running for president, she says we need a time-out on trade. No one knows when this time-out will end -- maybe after the election."

I have said before that I don't necessarily hang Clinton for what her husband did before, ... but she did do what Obama says.  She defended NAFTA.

 
We give the China gov't a tax break for buying our companies? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Monday, 11 February 2008

A commenter pointed out this article.  Astounding!  When the Chinese government buys our companies, they don't pay our income or other taxes apparently.

 
Pres - The Candidates on Trade Once Again PDF Print E-mail
Written by Stumo   
Monday, 11 February 2008

Here is a pretty good synopsis of Clinton and Obama's trade positions.  It looks like Obama is a free trader, much more than Clinton.  Clinton has stronger statements, including opposition to the Panama, South Korea and Columbia FTA's.  Obama has not stated support or opposition, which worries me.  I must believe right now that he would support them.  Obama should be challenged on this.

I have raised questions about Obama's economic advisors, like Austan Goolsbee, who are free traders.  And this post provides more detail.  The corporate Democrat line that we should have labor and environmental standards, and trade adjustment assistance (burial insurance) seems prominent.  This strategy is a path to economic failure and collapse.  No jobs, businesses or farms will be supported in this, the strongest economy still in the world that can't reap the benefits from itself.

McCain is an unreformed wacko free trader living in la-la land.  He is not worth discussing further, as I've outlined his positions, in his own words, before.

UPDATED:  Obama did state opposition to the South Korea FTA.

"Senator Obama does not support the South Korea free trade agreement in its current form," Obama spokesperson Jen Psaki tells ABC News. "He has serious concerns about the effect that the agreement would have on the American auto, beef, and rice industries, as well as the lack of labor and environmental protections in the agreement. Senator Obama is also troubled that the Bush Administration has not done more to help American workers who are losing their jobs as a result of the changing world economy." 

 
The Farm Bill: A Headache of Biblical Proportion PDF Print E-mail
Written by Richard R. Oswald   
Monday, 11 February 2008

Lots of things on the farm cause headaches. Right up near the top of the list is headaches caused by too much stress from biblical things like drought, flood, pestilence and disease. But nothing is more biblical than money. Luke manages to sum it up pretty well in Verse 12:16-21 in the Bible.

Of course, modern farmers have more reasons for monetary migraines than ancient tillers of the soil do, because not only do we have modern futures markets, but we also have the farm bill. I have survived more farm bills than Noah survived floods, because while Noah only had to make it through THE BIG ONE, I've had to wade through at least three Freedom-to-Farm farm bills. Each one seemed bigger than the one before.

 
It's sort of like biblical triple jeopardy.

 
Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

Results 37 - 45 of 66