|
13 yrs for FDA to inspect foreign drug plants |
|
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Thursday, 14 February 2008 |
|
Poisonous heparin
is the latest Chinese product to harm our citizens. 350 people
became ill from the heparin, which is a common blood thinner injected
into our bodies by our doctors in our hospitals.
The article also mentions a GAO report I missed. The report had these happy facts:
The Government Accountability Office recently reported that at its
current inspection pace, the F.D.A. would need at least 13 years to
inspect every foreign drug plant that exports products to the United
States. The office, an independent arm of Congress, also found that the
F.D.A.s computer systems were deficient and it had little idea how
many plants had been approved for exports to the United States.
Wow.
UPDATE: The FDA violated its own rules by approving the plant to sell heparin without inspecting that plant. "It was obviously a glitch," said the FDA. No. Its a big freaking deal.
Dr. Ajay Singh, director of dialysis at the Brigham and Womens
Hospital in Boston, said he was astonished by what he called the many
failures to ensure a safe supply of heparin. There are 450,000 people
in the United States on dialysis, and nearly all of them need copious
doses of heparin, he said. Heparin is also used in cardiac surgery and
among chronic care patients.
We need to ensure that this country has access to the crucial
medicines it needs, Dr. Singh said. This is a national security
issue.
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Wednesday, 13 February 2008 |
|
Just chronicling the candidates' talk on our issues. Obama today in Wisconsin:
While campaigning in Wisconsin, Obama took his own shots at
Clinton, criticizing her for supporting the North America Free Trade
Agreement while former President Clinton was president.
"You know, in the years after her husband signed NAFTA, Sen. Clinton
would go around talking about how great it was and how many benefits it
would bring," Obama said in Janesville, Wisconsin. "Now that she's
running for president, she says we need a time-out on trade. No one
knows when this time-out will end -- maybe after the election."
I have said before that I don't necessarily hang Clinton for what
her husband did before, ... but she did do what Obama says. She
defended NAFTA.
|
|
|
We give the China gov't a tax break for buying our companies? |
|
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Monday, 11 February 2008 |
|
A commenter pointed out this article. Astounding! When the Chinese government buys our companies, they don't pay our income or other taxes apparently.
|
|
|
Pres - The Candidates on Trade Once Again |
|
|
|
|
Written by Stumo
|
|
Monday, 11 February 2008 |
|
Here
is a pretty good synopsis of Clinton and Obama's trade positions.
It looks like Obama is a free trader, much more than Clinton.
Clinton has stronger statements, including opposition to the Panama,
South Korea and Columbia FTA's. Obama has not stated support or
opposition, which worries me. I must believe right now that he
would support them. Obama should be challenged on this.
I have raised questions about Obama's economic advisors, like Austan Goolsbee, who are free traders. And this post
provides more detail. The corporate Democrat line that we should
have labor and environmental standards, and trade adjustment assistance
(burial insurance) seems prominent. This strategy is a path to
economic failure and collapse. No jobs, businesses or farms will
be supported in this, the strongest economy still in the world that
can't reap the benefits from itself.
McCain is an unreformed wacko free trader living in la-la
land. He is not worth discussing further, as I've outlined his
positions, in his own words, before.
UPDATED: Obama did state opposition to the South Korea FTA.
"Senator Obama does not support the South Korea free trade
agreement in its current form," Obama spokesperson Jen Psaki tells ABC
News. "He has serious concerns about the effect that the agreement
would have on the American auto, beef, and rice industries, as well as
the lack of labor and environmental protections in the agreement.
Senator Obama is also troubled that the Bush Administration has not
done more to help American workers who are losing their jobs as a
result of the changing world economy."
|
|
|
The Farm Bill: A Headache of Biblical Proportion |
|
|
|
|
Written by Richard R. Oswald
|
|
Monday, 11 February 2008 |
|
Lots of things on the farm cause headaches. Right up near
the top of the list is headaches caused by too much stress from biblical things
like drought, flood, pestilence and disease. But nothing is more biblical than
money.
Luke manages to sum it up pretty well in Verse 12:16-21 in
the Bible.
Of course, modern farmers have more reasons for monetary
migraines than ancient tillers of the soil do, because not only do we have
modern futures markets, but we also have the farm bill.
I have survived more farm bills than Noah survived floods,
because while Noah only had to make it through THE BIG ONE, I've had to wade
through at least three Freedom-to-Farm farm bills. Each one seemed bigger than
the one before.
It's sort of like biblical triple jeopardy.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>
|
| Results 37 - 45 of 66 |