John Edwards' campaign website has these words on trade.  It's pretty comprehensive.  I picked the best stuff.  There are some weasel words, some remedies I would change and some bromides, but overall pretty good.  Leo Hindery, Jr. is his economic advisor, and convened the Horizon Project, and obviously had significant influence on this policy position. (Read more).

Here is John Edwards website pronouncement on ag antitrust:

Creating Fairness for Family Farmers: Edwards recognizes that the rules are stacked against family farmers. He supports the strict enforcement of laws against anticompetitive mergers, unfair pricing, and country-of-origin laws. He will enact a strong national ban on packer ownership to stop the spread of large corporate hog interests and create a national moratorium on the construction and expansion of hog farm lagoons. To help family farmers he will also limit farm subsidies to $250,000 per person, close loopholes in payment limits, and expand conservation programs. 

The U.S. lost on cotton subsidies against Brazil at the WTO.   I'm an agnostic on the policy wisdom of cotton subsidies. 

Can anyone tell me when the U.S. won a WTO ruling?  The European hormone beef case perhaps.  But what other case(s)? 

The US Trade Representative says we win a lot.  But the Adminstration calls a lot of things a "win," when it is not a win.

Industry publication Manufacturing News says that we have lost 40 of 47 cases, and are the world's biggest WTO loser.

The World Trade Organization has ruled against the United States in 40 of 47 cases... That number is "astounding," according to Robert Lighthizer, a partner in charge the international trade group at the law firm of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom. The United States "has suffered disproportionately from the problems with the WTO dispute settlement system, having been named as a defendant in far more cases than any other WTO members."

Copyright Thomas I. Palley
 
            For the last several years the euro has been appreciating steadily against the U.S. dollar. Given the Chinese renminbi and other East Asian currencies are pegged to the dollar that means the euro has been appreciating steadily against all. This spells trouble for Euroland, and it suggests European policymakers should join with the U.S. to address the global problem of under-valued currencies.
 
The euro has now appreciated approximately seventy percent relative to its historic low against the dollar, set on October 26, 2000. This appreciation has been economically justified given Europe’s large trade surplus with the United States. That surplus peaked in 2005 and is now gradually coming down as the Euro appreciates, which is the exactly how a market based global economy is supposed to correct international financial imbalances.
 
Some in Europe are beginning to raise red flags regarding this appreciation, but the reality is it is still within the bounds of reasonableness. Though the euro has appreciated seventy percent against its historic low, it has only appreciated twenty percent relative to its January 1999 introductory parity. (Read more).